- Chief Rosanne Casimir’s 50% revenue-sharing demand and claim over the entire city of Kamloops
- Details of the Tahltan-Skeena Eskay Creek agreement as a UNDRIP precedent
- Why existing mine expansions (e.g., Mount Milligan) get fast-tracked while new projects face delays
- How DRIPA, UNDRIP, and Indigenous title claims create "hold-up" situations for mining companies
- The impact on junior miners, exploration, private property rights, and BC’s economic future
- The disconnect between government mining promotion and activist/Indigenous leverage
- Introduction from AMEBC Roundup 2026
- Tahltan-Skeena Eskay Creek Agreement Breakdown
- Chief Rosanne Casimir’s Keynote & 50/50 Revenue Demands
- Critique of “Half and Half” Framing & Patronizing Tone
- Risks to Private Property Rights & Mining Investment
- Hold-Up Problem & Junior Miner Challenges
- Implications for Kamloops Residents & BC Economy
- Closing Thoughts & Call for Awareness
- Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc Official Site: tkemlups.ca – land title claim details
- Skeena Resources Eskay Creek Agreement: skeenaresources.com – project & community benefits
- AMEBC (Association for Mineral Exploration BC): amebc.ca – Roundup 2026 reports
- DRIPA & UNDRIP (Government of BC): gov.bc.ca/undrip
- New Westminster Times: NewWestTimes.com – Kamloops land claim, mining revenue sharing, DRIPA coverage

No comments:
Post a Comment